Tomas Farjat vs Guido Ivan Justo Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 03 Mar at 07:23 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
T. Farjat vs G. Ivan Justo

 ARG
4
Win
Played
2
Win

 ARG
4
Win
Played
2
Win
Head-to-head: Farjat 4 - 2 Justo
They have played 13 sets in total, with Tomas Farjat winning 7 and Guido Ivan Justo winning 6. The last match between Guido Ivan Justo and Tomas Farjat was at the Cordoba Challenger, 03-03-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: Clay, with Guido Ivan Justo getting the victory 6-3 7-6(5).
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins | 
|---|---|
| Farjat | 4 | 
| Justo | 2 | 
Last 6 H2H Matches:
(Q3) Cordoba Challenger(03-03-25)
(Q3) Antofagasta Challenger(09-18-23)
(R1) M15 Buenos Aires(08-29-23)
T. Farjat vs G. I. Justo H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 | 
| 57.35% (199-148) | Career Total W/L | 60.57% (212-138) | 
| 4 | Clay | 2 | 
| 1 | Titles | 4 | 
| 4 | Total H2H Matches | 2 | 
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) | 
T. Farjat vs G. I. Justo Match Preview:
Which player has the upper hand in terms of second serve efficiency over the past six months? Justo seems to have a slight edge, winning 42.21% of points off their second serve, a tad better than Farjat's 39.81%. This metric often indicates how well players handle crucial in-game situations, making it a reliable predictor of match outcomes.
How do they compare when it comes to returning their opponent’s second serve? Interestingly, Farjat edges out Justo here, capturing 47.37% compared to Justo's 46.4%. However, when faced with first serves, the tables turn dramatically. Justo dominates with 33% returns, vastly surpassing Farjat's 22.29%. These statistics paint a complex picture of their relative strengths and vulnerabilities on court.
Under pressure, which player buckles and who stands firm? When it comes to saving breakpoints, Farjat seems to hold the psychological upper hand with a 56.25% savings rate, compared to Justo's 50.65%. This ability to fend off breakpoints could indeed play a pivotal role in the final shake-up, especially when odds are tight and stakes are high.
Performance across various surfaces also adds layers to this predictive puzzle. Justo's forte appears on clay, boasting a 62% win rate, while indoors on hard surfaces, Farjat thrives with a 75% win rate. Understanding these surface preferences could be crucial, as these win rates often heavily influence a player's adaptability and game strategy.
Delving into their head-to-head history, in five encounters, Farjat has triumphed thrice, even clinching their most recent meeting at the Antofagasta Challenger. Interestingly, in matches that extend to deciding sets, Justo has shown resilience, winning 65% of such matches over the past year, a statistic vital for those contemplating live predictions and betting decisions.
Finally, both players converge in extreme pressure scenarios, with Justo having a slight edge in tiebreak situations, winning both they've contested against Farjat. Farjat, however, has faced slightly more formidable opponents, indicated by the average rank of 327.09 compared to Justo's 340.68. These nuances suggest a close match that could easily tilt either way, but with Justo's historically stronger first serve returns and tiebreak composure, they might just emerge victorious.
Analyzing breakpoints, both conversion and saving, along with opponent quality and past performances, all hint at a thrilling confrontation. While past records favor Farjat, Justo's strength under extreme pressure, particularly in tiebreaks and deciding sets, makes them a formidable contender in this impending matchup. Expect an exhilarating duel where Justo might just edge ahead.
Tomas Farjat vs Guido Ivan Justo Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
T. Farjat vs G. I. Justo H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3 | H2H Matches Won | 2 | 
| 7 | Sets Won | 6 | 
| 67 | Games Won | 57 | 
| 35 | Aces (Total) | 9 | 
| 23 | Total Double Faults | 12 | 
| 1:26:57 | Average Match Time | 1:26:57 | 
| 56% (216/389) | 1st Serve % | 67% (272/404) | 
| 71% (154/216) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (183/272) | 
| 52% (90/173) | 2nd Serve Win % | 53% (70/132) | 
| 40% (17/43) | Break Pts Won % | 38% (10/26) | 
| 37% (151/404) | Return Points Win % | 37% (145/389) | 
| 60% (3/5) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 40% (2/5) | 
| 50% (1/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (1/2) | 
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 75% (3/4) | 
| 0% (0/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 25% (1/4) | 
| 25% (1/4) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/2) | 
Recent Performance Stats
T. Farjat Recent Matches Played
G. I. Justo Recent Matches Played

T. Farjat vs G. I. Justo Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57.35% (199/148) | YTD Win/Loss | 60.57% (212/138) | 
| 54.45% (434/363) | Sets Win/Loss | 58.38% (467/333) | 
| 51.34% (3894/3690) | Games Win/Loss | 53.34% (3866/3382) | 
| 61.54% (32/20) | Hard Win/Loss | 48.15% (13/14) | 
| 56.36% (164/127) | Clay Win/Loss | 61.88% (198/122) | 
| 75.00% (3/1) | Indoor Hard W/L | 33.33% (1/2) | 
| 0.38 | Aces Per Game | 0.11 | 
| 1403 | Aces Total | 387 | 
| 0.21 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.2 | 
| 790 | Total Double Faults | 699 | 
| 1:14:35 | Average Match Time | 1:29:36 | 
| 364.73 | Average Opponent Rank | 411.48 | 
| 57% (10859/19054) | 1st Serve % | 66% (12800/19388) | 
| 70% (7618/10859) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (8015/12800) | 
| 46% (3771/8195) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (3206/6587) | 
| 41% (727/1790) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (1075/2327) | 
| 39% (7245/18517) | Return Points Win % | 44% (8707/19710) | 
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0.00% (0/2) | 
| 50.67% (38/37) | Challenger W/L | 52.56% (41/37) | 
| 59.19% (161/111) | Futures W/L | 63.33% (171/99) | 
| 56% (190/338) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 61% (207/340) | 
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 25% (1/4) | 
| 51% (50/99) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 60% (50/84) | 
| 59% (64/108) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (59/103) | 
| 88% (173/153) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (195/176) | 
| 11% (173/19) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 9% (195/18) | 
| 25% (174/44) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (154/34) |